Os recomiendo ver (o volver a ver ) en el canal en la medida de lo posible los videos: CEREBRO CUANTICO, ADN Y FRACTALIDAD y ADN= LASER DE FOTONES para complementar este video, ellos estan interelacionados con el tema. Actualmente y gracias a los avances en el campo de la Neurocardiología, se ha demostrado que el corazón no sólo no es una simple “bomba” mecánica, sino que además tiene un sistema nervioso intrínseco (SNI) altamente complejo compuesto por más de 40.000 neuronas e interneuronas cuyo circuito permite cualificarlo y calificarlo como un cerebro.Ademas, en estas neuronas del corazon se dan procesos de mecánica cuántica localizados en los microtubulos de estas neuronas con lo que se puede decir que el corazon es un dispositivo electromagnético y cuántico que nos permite anticiparnos al tiempo en 4.5 segundos de lo que va a suceder antes que suceda en el cerebro.
1] Stuart R. Hameroff, Roger Penrose, “Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory,” Physics of Life Reviews 11: 39-78, 2014, doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2013.08.002.
[2] Elisabeth Davenas et al., “Human basophil degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE,” Nature 333: 816-818, 1988, doi: 10.1038/333816a0.
[3] Lajos Diósi, “A universal master equation for the gravitational violation of the quantum mechanics,” Physics Letters A 120: 377-381, 1987, doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(87)90681-5.
[4] Roger Penrose, “On Gravity’s role in Quantum State Reduction,” General Relativity and Gravitation 28: 581-600, 1996, doi: 10.1007/BF02105068.
[5] Roger Penrose, “The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds and The Laws of Physics,” Oxford University Press, 1989, ISBN 0-19-851973-7.
[6] Stuart R. Hameroff, Richard C. Watt, “Information processing in microtubules,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 98: 549-561, 1982, doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(82)90137-0.
[7] Jeffrey R. Reimers et al., “The revised Penrose–Hameroff orchestrated objective-reduction proposal for human consciousness is not scientifically justified: Comment on “Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory” by Hameroff and Penrose,” Physics of Life Reviews11: 101–103, 2014, doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.003.
[8] L. K. McKemmish et al., “Penrose–Hameroff orchestrated objective-reduction proposal for human consciousness is not biologically feasible,” Physical Review E 80: 021912, 2009, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.021912.
[9] Stuart Hameroff, Roger Penrose, “Reply to criticism of the ‘Orch OR qubit’ – ‘Orchestrated objective reduction’ is scientifically justified,” Physics of Life Reviews11: 104–112, 2014, doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.014.
[10] Satyajit Sahua et al., “Atomic water channel controlling remarkable properties of a single brain microtubule: Correlating single protein to its supramolecular assembly,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics 47: 141–148, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.02.050.
[11] Satyajit Sahua et al., “Multi-level memory-switching properties of a single brain microtubule,” Applied Physics Letters 102: 123701, 2013, doi: 10.1063/1.4793995.
[12] Subrata Ghosh, Satyajit Sahua, Anirban Bandyopadhyay, “Evidence of massive global synchronization and the consciousness: Comment on “Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory” by Hameroff and Penrose,” Physics of Life Reviews11: 83-84, 2014, doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2013.10.007.
1] Stuart R. Hameroff, Roger Penrose, “Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory,” Physics of Life Reviews 11: 39-78, 2014, doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2013.08.002.
[2] Elisabeth Davenas et al., “Human basophil degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE,” Nature 333: 816-818, 1988, doi: 10.1038/333816a0.
[3] Lajos Diósi, “A universal master equation for the gravitational violation of the quantum mechanics,” Physics Letters A 120: 377-381, 1987, doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(87)90681-5.
[4] Roger Penrose, “On Gravity’s role in Quantum State Reduction,” General Relativity and Gravitation 28: 581-600, 1996, doi: 10.1007/BF02105068.
[5] Roger Penrose, “The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds and The Laws of Physics,” Oxford University Press, 1989, ISBN 0-19-851973-7.
[6] Stuart R. Hameroff, Richard C. Watt, “Information processing in microtubules,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 98: 549-561, 1982, doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(82)90137-0.
[7] Jeffrey R. Reimers et al., “The revised Penrose–Hameroff orchestrated objective-reduction proposal for human consciousness is not scientifically justified: Comment on “Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory” by Hameroff and Penrose,” Physics of Life Reviews11: 101–103, 2014, doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.003.
[8] L. K. McKemmish et al., “Penrose–Hameroff orchestrated objective-reduction proposal for human consciousness is not biologically feasible,” Physical Review E 80: 021912, 2009, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.021912.
[9] Stuart Hameroff, Roger Penrose, “Reply to criticism of the ‘Orch OR qubit’ – ‘Orchestrated objective reduction’ is scientifically justified,” Physics of Life Reviews11: 104–112, 2014, doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.014.
[10] Satyajit Sahua et al., “Atomic water channel controlling remarkable properties of a single brain microtubule: Correlating single protein to its supramolecular assembly,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics 47: 141–148, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.02.050.
[11] Satyajit Sahua et al., “Multi-level memory-switching properties of a single brain microtubule,” Applied Physics Letters 102: 123701, 2013, doi: 10.1063/1.4793995.
[12] Subrata Ghosh, Satyajit Sahua, Anirban Bandyopadhyay, “Evidence of massive global synchronization and the consciousness: Comment on “Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory” by Hameroff and Penrose,” Physics of Life Reviews11: 83-84, 2014, doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2013.10.007.
CORAZON CEREBRO CUANTICO / CIENCIACONCIENCIACRITICA C3 clara martinez thedy de safa | |
127 Likes | 127 Dislikes |
3,081 views views | 6.17K followers |
Education | Upload TimePublished on 19 Jun 2018 |
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét